A clearer review workflow & fairer scoring
A rebuilt review experience on the abstract page, with reviews that stick around and scores that stay fair.
- A rebuilt Review & Scoring section — see who's reviewing at a glance with status chips for each assigned reviewer ('Review submitted' or 'Awaiting review'), an overall score with a per-criterion breakdown, and every review laid out in one place with its criteria, comment, and score.
- Reviews now stick around — removing a reviewer no longer throws away their work. A submitted review stays on the abstract under a 'Former reviewer' badge and keeps counting toward the score, so you never lose feedback you've already gathered.
- Curate reviews directly — organizers can delete any review (with a confirmation first), even on abstracts you've already accepted, and reviewers can still edit or remove their own review right up until a decision is made. Assigned reviewers and organizers also get a prompt to add their review straight from the abstract page.
- Improvement: the Reviewer Workload card now shows Reviewer, Reviewed, and Pending at a glance and keeps a reviewer's counts even after they've been un-assigned.
- Improvement: decided abstracts no longer count as pending or clutter a reviewer's queue, so your pending numbers reflect real outstanding work.
- Improvement: the Attendee, Abstract Data, Final Decision, and Interaction History cards on the abstract page have a refreshed design, with quick Preview, Download, and Upload new actions on attached files.
- A handful of smaller bug fixes across review scoring and reviewer assignments.
- Good to know: reviewers now only see each other's scores and comments once everyone has submitted — their own review stays visible throughout — so early opinions can't sway the rest of the panel.